Odds versus ranges
Poker Strategy
/
Marcus Bateman /
28 March 2011 /
Leave a Comment
Despite feeling that they did everything right and lost to a bad beat, the simple fact is that the call in itself is often a huge mistake, as they were lucky to even run into the lower part of the opponent's range.
Bad poker players will usually tell bad beat stories along the lines of something like this:
'Well I had pocket eights and I just knew he was bluffing so I got my stack all in pre flop and he had just six seven suited and made a flush. Oh well at least I got my money in ahead.'
Although there is a lot wrong with this analysis, I just want to focus on one key area of what makes this sort of thinking a problem, which lies in comparing direct odds after events. In poker you basically never get to compare odds versus specific hands until after you have made your choice, at which point your thinking (and therefore skill) is by definition over.
Because of this point, good players are perpetually comparing your hand with a range of possible options - not any one specific hand. Take the above example. This can appear like the player in question did everything right, yet beneath the surface there is much more going on here.
If we know that the opponent in this case is only making the same play with hands like suited connectors 10% of the time, but will have jacks or better the other 90%, our hand is clearly a huge dog to call with. Despite feeling that they did everything right and lost to a bad beat, the simple fact is that the call in itself is often a huge mistake, as they were lucky to even run into the lower part of the opponent's range.
Despite sounding extremely counter-intuitive, poker is a game where you can often be making huge mistakes when you appear to get your money in ahead and do the 'right' thing. Miss-estimating bluffing ranges is one example, but so is waiting too long for big hands in tournaments and blinding down to an unplayable stack, or simply not playing enough hands to ever get action.
It is best in poker to bluff with hands that have little showdown value, which means that against good players you will frequently see them turn up with junk in spots where you pat yourself on the back for calling with a marginal hand. However, the good player is very glad to see you calling with those types of hands for the most part, as it just opens you up to endless trips to value town the 90% of the time in the same spot they have big hands. Poker is a lot more complex than just getting your money in good - and thinking extremely carefully about the price on offer against the actual range of hands is fundamental to winning poker.
Choose and earn a $50, $250, $500, $1000 or $2500 poker sign up bonus. Turn Loyalty Into Cash and earn up to 40% Valueback in the Players Club.
Read More Poker
Tourney Strategy: The Stop-and-Go
Being short-stacked in a no-limit hold'em tournament is never ideal, whether during the early, middle, or late stages. Whereas a big stack affords you a wide range of options both before and after the flop, when you find yourself having...
Taking Hands Off
Say you're in a no-limit hold'em cash game. After struggling for most of the session, you've just won a nice pot and now suddenly you're back in black. The next hand has begun, it folds to you in the hijack...
How To Play Longer Poker Sessions
When I first started taking online poker more seriously I always used to read about professional players logging eight hour sessions and just wonder how on Earth they used to manage it because I'd be defeated after 45-60 minutes of...
Light Three-Betting in No-Limit Hold'em
Once upon a time a preflop three-bet -- that is, a reraise over an opening raise -- was an unmistakable signal of strength in no-limit hold'em. When it came to preflop play, the vast majority of players refused to consider...