Small losses, big wins
Cash
/
Marcus Bateman /
07 January 2011 /
Leave a Comment
Playing deep stacked poker is much harder than shallow stack poker, so in this situation I ended up making my life hard against the good players, with no extra benefit from the fish.
Poker is not just a game about how you play each hand. There are many other important considerations to think about when you view a table, and one of the most important is how much you buy in for.
I remember playing a short handed game when I first started playing in live games seriously where a known fish was sitting and losing heavily. Every time he went bust he would simply rebuy for fifty big blinds and carry on losing. The remaining three players all had quite big stacks as a result of this, and without thinking I sat down in the game with the maximum two hundred buy ins allowed.
This was a big mistake. Although the fish carried on donating to the table, I kept finding myself in very difficult deep stacked hands against the skilled live players, who were obviously getting much more information from me than I could gather from them (still being new to live poker I'm sure I had some pretty obvious live tells), which all made my life much harder than it should have been. I ended up losing my profit from the fish plus interest in a few large pots, and left the building cursing my luck that night.
A few months later, while reading Barry Greenstein's excellent book Ace on The River, I realised I had made a pretty big error sitting so deep in this situation. Although it would have been fine had the fish been sitting with two hundred big blinds, with the table mark only playing fifty big blinds there is no reason for me to not sit with anything other than fifty big blinds.
Playing deep stacked poker is much harder than shallow stack poker, so in this situation I ended up making my life hard against the good players, with no extra benefit from the fish. Had I bought in for fifty big blinds, I would have made my life easier against the good players, and been just the same against the fish - clearly a vastly better result. In situations such as this you only need to have enough chips to be able to win all of the weak players stack - anything above that simply exposes you to greater risk against players at least equal (and often much better) than you. It is important to think carefully about the table dynamic before you choose your buy in amount - it may be that you are over exposing yourself to risk without even noticing it.
Related Entries
The little things add up in poker
What makes poker so special?
The simplest path
Sign up for a free Betfair Poker account using this link and you will be able to choose your own welcome bonus of between $50 to $2,500
Read More Poker
Taking Hands Off
Say you're in a no-limit hold'em cash game. After struggling for most of the session, you've just won a nice pot and now suddenly you're back in black. The next hand has begun, it folds to you in the hijack...
Light Three-Betting in No-Limit Hold'em
Once upon a time a preflop three-bet -- that is, a reraise over an opening raise -- was an unmistakable signal of strength in no-limit hold'em. When it came to preflop play, the vast majority of players refused to consider...
Push 'em Provides Chance to Sharpen Short-Stacked Strategy
There's a new game debuting on Betfair Poker this week called Push 'em, a variant designed to provide action in a hurry. A no-limit hold'em cash game, Push 'em requires players to buy in for exactly five big blinds --...
The Squeeze Play
The term "squeeze play" is sometimes used loosely to describe all sorts of situations in "big bet" games like no-limit hold'em and pot-limit Omaha in which a player exerts pressure on another with a hefty raise. But in fact, the...