The Betfair Prof: "If crowds are so wise, why can't they solve a million dollar maths challenge?"
The Betfair Prof
/ Leighton Vaughan Williams / 08 May 2009 / 1 Comments
On 24 May, 2000, during a meeting held at the College de France in Paris, the challenge was made. A million dollars would be paid to anyone offering a proof or a counterexample to any of seven mathematical conjectures.
The offer was made by Arthur Jaffe, co-founder (with Landon Clay) of the Clay Mathematics Institute. In the same year, British publisher Tony Faber offered a million dollars to anyone who could prove that every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two (not necessarily different) prime numbers, e.g. 74 can be expressed as the sum of the prime numbers 31 and 43. This is the 'Goldbach Conjecture', first formally proposed in a letter dated 7 June, 1742, from Prussian mathematician Christian Goldbach to Leonhard Euler. The purpose of the Faber offer was to publicize 'Uncle Petros and Goldbach's Conjecture', a novel on the Faber and Faber publishing list by Apostolos Doxiadis.
What is especially interesting about all these million dollar prizes is that they have the potential to incentivize and focus the minds of a diverse set of amateur and professional mathematicians around the world. In other words, to tap into the wisdom of the crowd.
So nine years later, where are we with Goldbach and his primes? Faber and Faber have sold quite a few books. That much is known and could have been predicted. It has also been shown by computer that Goldbach's Conjecture is true for all even numbers up to 1,200,000,000,000,000,000. Even so, we are no closer to a formal proof than we were when the prize was announced.
How about the conjectures identified by the Clay Mathematics Institute? Better news here. Of the seven one has been proved, the one that states in simple terms that 'a sphere is a sphere is a sphere', i.e. no matter what you do to it other than tearing it (punch it, pinch it, kick it, twist it, squeeze it, squash it, poke it, inflate it, deflate it), it remains a sphere, even when the surface of the sphere is in three dimensions (the surface of an ordinary sphere is two-dimensional, of course, though it encloses a three-dimensional volume). Put more rigorously, the conjecture can be expressed as 'Every simple connected, compact three-dimensional manifold (without a boundary) is a three-dimensional sphere.' Got it?
Anyway, this is the Poincare conjecture, named in honour of French polymath Jules Henri Poincare, and proved in 2003 by Grigori Perelman, though he's declared that he doesn't want the prize. The other six conjectures remain unresolved. For the record, these relate to the Hodge Conjecture, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, the Riemann Hypothesis, Yang-Mills Theory, the Navier-Stokes Equations and the P versus NP Problem. So here we have a market the size of the world and a total of 8 million dollars worth of liquidity, and only one of the conjectures has been proved, and that by someone who shuns the crowd and hasn't even bothered to pursue the formal conditions required to pick up the prize.
So we are left with the obvious question. If crowds are so wise, why can't they solve a million dollar maths challenge? Any takers?
Professor Leighton Vaughan Williams is the Director of the Political Forecasting Unit and Betting Research Unit of Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University
Comments (1)
How to claim your free £25 bet:
1. Open your account (3 mins)
2. Make a deposit into your account and place your bets
3. If you lose any of your bets, we'll cover you up to £25
Free £25 Sports Bet, Join Today
Get $600 Free for all new players. Just register a credit card to claim.
Join today and get your $600 Free at Betfair Poker
100% deposit bonus up to £50 for all new casino players. Just join and play to claim.
Join Today. Click here to claim your £50 Casino Bonus
Earn substantial rewards every time you introduce someone new to Betfair, Betfair Poker, Betfair Casino or Betfair Games
Refer and Earn Today
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007



Marcus Bateman | 12 May 2009
Is it not the case that crowds are only good at solving things when they are prepared to put their money where their mouth is? The incentive to win something with no risk does very little in terms of focussing the mind compared to when it is your own money that you are risking.