
Ivey Versus Booth
This is a hand between arguably the worlds best poker player - Phil Ivey, and high stakes cash game player Brad Booth.
It displays some of the great thought processes involved in high stakes poker, where all the players know that they have to be creative and to mix their game up to be successful.
David Williams raises jack nine off suit, which is just a standard attempt to steal the blinds. Brad Booth re-raises with the two four of spades, obviously hoping to take a flop in position with a hand that can flop a monster. Phil Ivey wakes up in the big blind with pocket kings and puts in a standard re-raise - probably with the intention of narrowing the field by knocking David Williams out of the hand, as well as building a pot with his big pair.
David Williams quickly folds, seeing that his hand is far too weak for the situation (jack nine off suit plays awfully on nearly all flops in deep stacked poker), but Brad Booth realises that Phil Ivey must have a big hand and elects to call with his little suited connector. He does this for two reasons in my opinion - firstly, he knows that if he hits a big flop he may well be able to stack Phil Ivey; and secondly, by asking Phil Ivey how much he has behind before calling he tells Phil Ivey (through needing to know what implied odds are on offer) that he has a small pair or small connector - enabling him to bluff any board that hits these sorts of hands.
The flop is a perfect one for Booth - connected, low and with a flush draw. This is exactly the sort of flop that could have hit his hand hard, and he knows that Phil Ivey knows this is true. Phil Ivey leads out with a standard continuation bet and Brad Booth moves in on him. This is a horrible spot to be in when playing deep stacked cash, and one Phil Ivey is all to aware of. Because Phil Ivey plays so many hands, he is usually the player cracking other peoples over pairs with small connectors and pairs - and I bet after Brad Booth's raise he is thinking of all the monster pots he has won off people who just couldn't fold there over pair when he had hit an unlikely looking flop.
So many of the hands that booth could have he is behind. A set of threes, sevens or sixes, two pair with either six-seven, six-three or a straight with four five. He is also in bad shape against many of the drawing hands out there. His hand plays very badly against hands like a pair and a flush draw, an open ended straight and flush draw, or the nut flush draw (due to the ace as an over card and therefore extra outs). In light of all this Phil Ivey decides to fold after a good long think.
This is a classic "I know that you know that I know" situation in poker - Brad Booth picks up what Phil Ivey has, gives him a vague clue what he does, then ruthlessly piles on the pressure when he sees the low flop.
Comments (2)
Are these supposed poker players for real ?
Whilst they tell you to fold pairs of jacks or queens, apparently it's ok to raise with J9 off or absolutely nothing 42 ?!!
And yes Booth could theoretically have had a small pair but Ivey should have asked himself, "Why is he all in and not just raising ?".
Then the decision is easy - call it and take the idiot shmuck down.
J Trent | 20 August 2008
Benefits and offers
£50 CASINO BONUS
100% deposit bonus up to £50 for all new casino players. Just join and play to claim.

£10 FREE BET
How to claim your free £10 bet:
1. Open your account (3 mins)
2. Deposit and bet £10 in one go, or a series of bets
3. Win or lose, we will pay you the £10 within 24 hours

Poker calendar
Qualify for Aussie Millions
Sunday 28th Dec at 18:00 BST
$55k GTD
Sundays at 19:05 BST
$10 MAX Fee on ALL tourneys
Annette 15 $20k GTD
Every Friday at 19.30 BST
Kunku Wap $20k GTD
Every Monday at 19.30 BST
New Heavy Handed Series
Daily
Boost Your Bankroll
Play risk free poker
Sit and Go Leaderboards
Pokerfecta
Other items





Are these supposed poker players for real ?
Whilst they tell you to fold pairs of jacks or queens, apparently it's ok to raise with J9 off or absolutely nothing 42 ?!!
And yes Booth could theoretically have had a small pair but Ivey should have asked himself, "Why is he all in and not just raising ?".
Then the decision is easy - call it and take the idiot shmuck down.
J Trent | 20 August 2008